Apology accepted :-) sure, I share your frustration, but you see, ironic posts won't give us any more documentation... And I am by no means a SER 2.0 expert, due to my non-coding status I'm nearly as far behind as others (but yes, my involvement makes it easier to navigate new stuff). I don't get nearly enough time to play around with things as I want.  The module in question is db_ops and now that I am online again, I see that the README file in the modules/db_ops has not been converted to online doc yet (a non-developer, regular user took on the job to convert the docs, but due to change in work situation had to quit before he finished all and nobody has stepped up yet.)

g-)

PS! btw, yes, I admit I was "snippy" in my last post, so maybe some of what you wrote was warrented. I'm not paid to do support on serusers and every time I spend time doing it, I use precious personal time that could have been spent on ... documentation (or maybe even family)! 

SIP wrote: 
You know, I just reread my latest email and it sounds pretty offensive.  
That was NOT its intention, and I apologise.

My point is, you seem to have the mistaken impression that a lot of us 
have roughly the same skill level and experience as you do when you give 
guidance with SER.  I assure you, this is most certainly not the case. 
If it were, we wouldn't be constantly asking you for answers. :)

I would very much have given a better answer to Jesús if I HAD one, but 
I don't. I myself was kind of hoping for a little more detail on that 
one without having to dig through the code/modules.

N.

Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
  
Well, considering I was posting from my mobile (and right now as well), didn't remember the exact names, and iptel.org has an excellent doc search system, I considered that well within the capabilities of people who use SER. That should hold, BTW, for you as well, so if you think more guidance is needed, instead of posting ironic comments, you could help the "poor" guy by looking it up yourself and post more details. 
g-)

------- Original message -------
From: SIP <sip@arcdiv.com>
Cc: terblas@gmail.com, serusers@iptel.org
Sent: 1.9.'07,  14:26

  
    
So are you going to tell poor Jesús what these magical modules are, or 
just leave him guessing? ;)

N.

Greger Viken Teigre wrote:
    
      
With ser 2.x there are a couple of modules for sql direct (even raw sql) access. Should fit the bill...
g-)

------- Original message -------
From: SIP <sip@arcdiv.com>
Cc: serusers@iptel.org
Sent: 31.8.'07,  20:39

  
      
        
Jesús Terán wrote:
    
        
          
Hello, I am using the exec_dset for access to my database mysql 
and change the uri in the calls, but I think this use more CPU 
processing, Are there other module to do the same?
 
thanks
 
Jesus Teran B.
------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
  
      
          
            
I'm aware of none pre-written for that purpose... however, you could 
probably modify one in existence to do just that in C/C++ (assuming you 
could reverse engineer what's going on in the modules) and it would 
likely be a lot faster than spawning a shell process for each call.

N.
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
    
        
          
  
      
        
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
    
      
  
    

_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers