13 Nov
2019
13 Nov
'19
7:28 a.m.
Hi Daniel,
For lua example, it's just an error when writing my email... in my config
file I have KSR.x.exit();
I have not tested a more complex config, but I'm curious about kemi
framework and how it works. So before anything else I made a simple test to
know the cpu overhead.
For this test, I noticed that the Recv-Q of kamailio remains high with
kemi/lua, and with the native one remains to 0, with children=1 of course.
Next step, is to use a more complex config file.
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 3:00 PM Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hello,
is it really just 'exit' in the ksr_core_received()? Because that should
shut down kamailio.
Anyhow, practically with the examples here, you test the difference
between looking up a function and doing exit in native kamailio.cfg and lua
script, which is really marginal comparing with the rest of configuration
file in a usual production deployment. Have you tested with a more complex
set of actions/functions?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 12.11.19 17:36, GG GG wrote:
Hi!
I just made a simple test performance between native script and kemi/lua
with the event_route[core:msg-received] callback.
# lua script children=1 cpu.process=100%
function ksr_core_received()
exit;
end
# native script children=1 cpu.process=70%
event_route[core:msg-received] {
exit;
}
# tested with udp 5060, 1000 Mbits/sec
iperf -c 127.0.0.1 -p 5060 -u -b1000m
I don't know if it's normal and what we should expect from kemi, but I
would like to share this with you. Maybe someone could confirm the
performance difference.
Have a good day !
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing
Listsr-users@lists.kamailio.orghttps://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda --
www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference - April 27-29, 2020, in Berlin -- www.kamailioworld.com