Thanks for the update. Working on making peace with it :P, moving some stuff around has resolved my immediate issue.
It will not go back to request_route; you'll have to make peace with that.
Most things are valid in the continued route. A few will doubtless
exhibit quirky behaviour as the state doesn't make it across properly
from the original requet_route. I haven't been adversely impacted by
this in my extensive use of http_async_client(), however.
On 11/2/20 8:42 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote:
> Alex,
>
> Hey hows it going!
>
> I realize execution continues in ROUTENAME however after this route is
> completed it does not go back to request_route { }. I suppose I could
> move the config around, just wanted to double check. Also part of the
> issue here is that I'm finding certain functions i.e. msg_apply_changes
> is not valid in the continued route.
>
> On Mon, Nov 2, 2020 at 5:36 PM Alex Balashov <abalashov@evaristesys.com
> <mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com>> wrote:
>
> Correct, this is expected behaviour. Execution will continue in
> ROUTENAME instead of returning to the calling route.
>
> On 11/2/20 8:33 PM, Brandon Armstead wrote:
> > kamailio 5.5.0-dev3
> >
> > I'm unsure if this is expected behavior, so thought I would ask...
> >
> > When using http_async_query("URI", "ROUTENAME")
> >
> > request_route {
> > route(AUTH);
> >
> > # this does not get executed below route(AUTH)
> > xinfo("[$ci][$rm] we hit this line");
> > }
> >
> > route[AUTH] {
> > t_newtran();
> > http_async_query("URI", "ROUTENAME");
> > }
> >
> > route[ROUTENAME] {
> > # do stuff here to check authentication and return
> >
> > if(auth + registration) {
> > append_hf("Path....");
> > msg_apply_changes(); # this fails and errors out about incorrect
> route
> > # ^ invalid usage - not in request route or a reply
> > save("location");
> > }
> >
> > if(auth + invite) {
> > # route to pstn
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Expected behavior: to be able to obtain some processing /
> information
> > gathering about authentication with the call and additional
> information
> > possibly and return to normal routing. As-is now I've to move the
> > actions all into ROUTENAME for kamailio to continue processing,
> it does
> > not go back to request_route { }.
> >
> > # this does not get executed below route(AUTH)
> >
> > Is this expected behavior, or am I missing something?
> >
> > If I do catch route(AUTH) with a hash table and prevent its
> execution
> > after first run, the avp's from the transaction created are not
> > available in request_route that were set in ROUTENAME.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> > sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
> > https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
> >
>
> --
> Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
>
> Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
> Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.kamailio.org>
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>
--
Alex Balashov | Principal | Evariste Systems LLC
Tel: +1-706-510-6800 / +1-800-250-5920 (toll-free)
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.csrpswitch.com/
_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users