30 Oct
2008
30 Oct
'08
1:18 a.m.
Ok... Maybe you're right. I've read somewhere that this service is needed
for taping reasons (policy and other law enforcements). If it's needed whe
can just turn it on for that specific number, right?
But answering to my question, can you point me some ideas refering about
equipment that i should use?
BR
Nuno
2008/10/29 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>
Yes. There are some liabilities with that in that the
signaling messages
may be incomplete (i.e. you may miss a BYE) and this is the usual reason
given for doing media proxying for more accurate accounting.
But the latency, bandwidth consumption, and increased complexity and cost
associated with doing it on a large scale does not justify it, in my
opinion. SIP-only accounting is "good enough" most of the time.
Nuno Marques wrote:
Without mediaproxy? Only based on SIP messages?
2008/10/29 Alex Balashov <abalashov(a)evaristesys.com <mailto:
abalashov(a)evaristesys.com>>
Nuno Marques wrote:
Every calls should pass through mediaproxy so that i can
account them.
You can do accounting without handling media.
-- Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599
--
Alex Balashov
Evariste Systems
Web : http://www.evaristesys.com/
Tel : (+1) (678) 954-0670
Direct : (+1) (678) 954-0671
Mobile : (+1) (706) 338-8599