Hi,
that was _really_ fast. Thanks. :-)
One more question: Could I somehow test with the route[NAT] for example, if the request was from the main route { ... } or from the onreply_route[] ?
Best regards, Bernhard
----- Original Message ----- From: Alex Balashov [mailto:abalashov@evaristesys.com] To: Bernhard Suttner [mailto:bernhard.suttner@winet.ch] Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org] Sent: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 21:37:34 +0100 Subject: Re: [SR-Users] onreply_route and failure_route
Yes.
-- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 260 Peachtree Street NW Suite 2200 Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/
On Jan 29, 2011, at 3:35 PM, "Bernhard Suttner" <bernhard.suttner@winet.ch
wrote:
Hi,
is it possible to call a route within onreply_ and failure_route? I mean, within the main route { ... } its possible to call the route [NAT]. Is this also possible for this "special" routes? If this is possible, is it also allowed to call a route which will normally called from the main route { ... }
Thanks in advance.
Best regards, Bernhard
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users