Dear Vaclav:
Thanks for your respond ,
BR, Allan
-----原始郵件----- 寄件者: serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] 代理 Vaclav Kubart 寄件日期: 2008年5月13日 下午 04:32 收件者: Allan Chao ( 趙廷睿 ) 副本: serusers@lists.iptel.org 主旨: Re: [Serusers] Presence Server
Hi Allan,
the presence server is called 'unstable' because it was not tested much. I tested it with EyeBeam and some other clients very long time ago and it seemed to be working that time, but I haven't tested it so much to be able to say that it is really stable. And I'm afraid a bit of changes in core since that time.
I don't know much about OpenSER presence so I can speak only for SER. SER's presence modules implementation is done according drafts before RFCs were released so it can differ a bit from RFC specification. But I hope not too much because that were some later draft versions (mentioned somewhere in docs).
with regards, Vaclav
On Po, kvě 12, 2008 at 12:01:38 +0800, Allan Chao ( 趙廷睿 ) wrote:
Dear All:
I want to use SER's Presence module to do presence server , but someone say it's not stable , so ,
- Does anyone could tell me why it doesn't stable ? because it looks work after i do some testing with eyebeam.
- how does openser's presence ? is it better than SER's presence ?
thanks, allan
DISCLAIMER: Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
DISCLAIMER: Sample Disclaimer added in a VBScript.