On Aug 27, 2014, at 5:48 AM, Eugene Prokopiev <enp(a)itx.ru> wrote:
Have SEMS any advantages over FreeSWITCH for topology
hiding?
More narrow and specialised use-cases, so you don't have to deal with
stripping it of PBX and miscellaneous application features. It's more of a
dedicated B2BUA (with its sbc module), in this case.
I tried to use SEMS but I've got error, which was reported about 2
years ago without any decision -
http://lists.iptel.org/pipermail/sems/2014-August/004451.html
You will have no problem doing this on Freeswitch. Stripping down FS from
it's default config is not hard. I like to rewrite the entire config organizing it
for the intended purpose. Thinking through what you want to do, write it down and then
rewrite the config. Just because FS has lots of features doesn't mean you need to use
them. It's not hard to disable them.
--FC