14 Aug
2014
14 Aug
'14
2:18 p.m.
You know what? I do have double RR disabled. I thought about that, and was so sure I
wouldn't have turned it off that I didn't even check. But it's disabled. I
feel quite stupid. Let me retest and let you know what happens.
On 14 August 2014 07:13:36 GMT-04:00, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On 14/08/14 12:47, Alex Balashov wrote:
Sure thing. I sent it to you privately to avoid masking IP addresses.
Just double checking -- you haven't disable the double rr via module,
isn't?
Do you have explicit listen= or it is left to listen on all interfaces?
Can you give the output of:
kamcmd corex.list_sockets ?
Daniel
--
Sent from my mobile, and thus lacking in the refinement one might expect from a fully
fledged keyboard.
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste Systems LLC
235 E Ponce de Leon Ave
Suite 106
Decatur, GA 30030
United States
Tel: +1-678-954-0671
Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/, http://www.alexbalashov.com
On 08/14/2014 06:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
>
> On 14/08/14 12:14, Alex Balashov wrote:
>> On 08/13/2014 11:28 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>
>>> On 13/08/14 17:21, Alex Balashov wrote:
>>>> On 08/13/2014 11:03 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Btw, is any of these sockets bound to a virtual network
interface?
>>
>> Yes; it's eth0 and eth0:1. Is that a factor?
>>
> Could be. Is record_route() adding two headers?
No, it is not.
Can you send the ngrep to see how it appears on the network?