RE: [Serusers] Load Balancing via UltraMonkey/ldirectord

Yah I noticed the other post after I posted mine, I don't see how it would easily be possible to address the sticky issue. It would require making a SIP aware proxy of sorts, which is a bit out of my abilities. Has anyone been able to address this issue? Of course a layer7 switch would do wonders and eliminate the need for all this, but who has that money laying around :D I've done a little research (google) and noticed people mentioning it when talking about LVS, one guy said he was going to write a module but posted nothing more. That would be pretty slick. Matt -----Original Message----- From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com] Sent: Monday, April 11, 2005 3:04 AM To: Matt Schulte; serusers(a)lists.iptel.org Subject: Re: [Serusers] Load Balancing via UltraMonkey/ldirectord If you see another thread (using the rather intuitive subject: Re: [Serusers] more usrloc synchronization), you will see discussions on using LVS in general. AFAIK, which high availability solution to use for LVS, is more based on your personal preferences, UltraMonkey is probably a safe choice. Anyway, you will need to address the "stickiness" issue. g-) Matt Schulte wrote: