2 Jan
2007
2 Jan
'07
5:08 p.m.
At 14:39 28/12/2006, inge wrote:
Hi Jiri,
Thanks for your answer.
I already use a new column since some month for SERWeb use. Is it
definitively impossible to do what I want ?
of course it is possible, it is just that I occur to think that what I'm suggesting
will cause you less pain. For example, if you upgrade to a later version of SER,
you will have to be less worried about migration of your database.
Maybe I'm not clear in my
explaination ?
But can you tell me more about user_attrs, I don't have this table in my
base.
I'm possibly too focused on the new version, ottendorf, and don't remember what
was (or not) in the previous one, but in any case I can only suggest you to use
ottendorf. Its DB model is documented under
http://www.iptel.org/ser/development/documentation
-jiri
Thanks.
Le jeudi 28 décembre 2006 à 13:35 +0100, Jiri Kuthan a écrit :
> I suggest not to touch the table and use user_attrs table instead for storing stuff
associated
> with subscribers.
>
> -jiri
>
> At 10:16 28/12/2006, inge wrote:
> >Hi all,
> >
> >I add a new column named "client" in subscriber table.
> >Next, I want to do a test wich seems like that in SQL :
> >
> >"SELECT client FROM subscriber WHERE username = "actual calling
number"
> >=> equivalent of avp_db_load I think ?
> >
> >Then, I think I must do a test on the previous values with an if and
> >avp_check I think.
> >
> >But my problem is to do this both requests with SER syntax in ser.cfg.
> >
> >Someone can help me ?
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Serusers mailing list
> >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
> >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
> --
> Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/