4 Mar
2008
4 Mar
'08
5:27 a.m.
El Tuesday 04 March 2008 11:20:47 Bogdan-Andrei Iancu escribió:
Hi guys,
Thanks a lot for the valuable input. In my opinion,trying to summarize
the discussion:
what we need is not to have a mechanism to ignore the C timer, but
rather a better way to manage/control C timer.
This means:
1) dropping (after all) the "noisy_ctimer" as it proves to be more or
less a hack
2) add new feature to manage/control C timer (like onreply route change
support, different routes for timeout and failures, etc)..
Is this commonly agreed?
I agree.
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es