21 Jun
2005
21 Jun
'05
10:07 a.m.
Jan Janak wrote:
On 21-06-2005 09:20, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Greger V. Teigre writes:
Let's try to make 0.9.x documentation as complete as possible nowleading up to the release!!
nathelper README doesn't describe all nat_uac_test modes. tm module README seems to lack description of several exported functions.
these both are example of bad iptel.org policy. no new features should be allowed to be added/changed in the code unless also the documentation is updated.
Are you suggesting that commits should be rejected if they do not update documentation as well ? What is better, having undocumented code or having no code ?
From the user's point of view there is no big difference: You can't use new features if you do not know that they exist - except you are also subscribed to the CVS-commits ;-)
regards, klaus