Re: [Users] client_nat_test

Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote: Good idea, but I was just looking at client_nat_test of mediaproxy module, not nat_uac_test of nathelper. To avoid confusions like that, I'd generally propose to rip out the nat-traversal stuff (client_nat_test, fix_contact) from mediaproxy, because it does exactly the same as the corresponding nathelper functions (nat_uac_test and fix_nated_contact). I don't see the point of having redundant code here. As noted before, customers are strongly advised not to use any. I guess, you all know why ;o) And there's no other point on the path where an ALG not under customer's or our control could be placed in this specific deployment. Regards, Andy