12 Aug
2005
12 Aug
'05
12:28 a.m.
Hello,
so actually the gateway is a NAT, and it is not SIP aware at all. From
the picture I got that the gateway adds also a via header with
ip2:port2. In this case, I understand your question, I will double check
how via header is built inside openser and come back with answer during
the day (too late now).
Daniel
On 08/11/05 21:06, ranveer kunal wrote:
hi,
RFC 3581 says if the the transport layer is UDP, the reply should
be sent to ip of ip packet received and the port shud be taken from
the via header, untill unless rport is there.
since in via header port is port1(it was written by proxy). next hop
proxy sends the reply to ip2:port1.
I have figured a work around, i'll force gateway to send the packet
from port=port1. Thus the problem will be solved.
Thanks.
Regards,
Ranveer.
On 8/11/05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
Hello,
On 08/11/05 04:33, ranveer kunal wrote:
hey daniel,
The packet from the ser proxy is statelessly forwarded
by a gateway that is inline with proxy, now i want next hop proxy to
reply on the port of the gateway rather than port of proxy. that is y
i need proxy to send rport.
proxy--------------gateway--------------next hop proxy
proxy -> ip1:port1-> gateway -> ip2:port2 -> next hop proxy
next hop proxy -> replies to ip2:port1 (hybrid) -> screws my setup
the next hop proxy is broken, why does it reply to ip2:port1? It should
reply to source_ip and source_port of the received request. The proxy is
not aware at all about ip2:port2 used by gateway.
Daniel
>can you suggest me some way to overcome this.
>
>Regards,
>Ranveer.
>
>On 8/11/05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>On 08/10/05 21:10, ranveer kunal wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>hi daniel,
>>> as far as i have explored force_rport(), places the rport
>>>parameter in the topmost via header and not in its own via header. am
>>>i right ?
>>>
>>>example :
>>>
>>>UAC ->
(via1:via2:via3)proxy(force_rport)->(via1:via2:via3,rport:via4)next proxy
>>>
>>>i want this :
>>>UAC ->
(via1:via2:via3)proxy(force_rport)->(via1:via2:via3:via4,rport)next proxy
>>>
>>>Please clarify it ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>yes, it is like that. And this is how it is supposed to be, according to
>>RFC3581. Why do you need it in proxy's via? The proxy will look at the
>>second via to get the destination address for reply.
>>
>>Daniel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Ranveer.
>>>
>>>On 8/10/05, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <daniel(a)voice-system.ro> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hello,
>>>>
>>>>you have to use force_rport() in the configuration file for the request
>>>>you want rport parameter in VIA.
>>>>
>>>>Daniel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>On 08/10/05 20:44, ranveer kunal wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>hi all,
>>>>> Is there a way to configure openser so that it sends rport in
>>>>>via header ? Actually th packet from server is reverse natted through
>>>>>another system using any random port, i want it the reply to come on
>>>>>the same port . thanks ....
>>>>>
>>>>>Regards,
>>>>>Ranveer.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>