16 Apr
2020
16 Apr
'20
9:44 a.m.
Hello,
did you print the log message just before t_relay()?
Can you also print the tcp and tls connections via rpc? I am not sure if
the websocket keeps a separate list of connections, but tcp/tls should
have the lists used for routing.
It would be better to upgrade to 5.3, because 5.1 is out of maintenance
and if there is still an issue, it is easier to troubleshoot and fix.
Then you can backport locally to 5.1, if you have to run that version on
specific systems.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 16.04.20 05:10, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hey Daniel,
It returns:
[LOCATION] ru: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid
<mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid>;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss,
*nh(u): sip:98.209.240.245:50453;transport=ws*
*
*
This matches the output from
kamcmd ws.dump
connections: {
29: wss:*98.209.240.245:50453* -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state: OPEN,
last used 22s ago, sub-protocol: sip)
}
info: {
wscounter: 1
truncated: no
}
}
I can grade to 5.3 if you think that’s best.
*
*
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
On Apr 15, 2020, at 12:11 PM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
when id is 0, then the search of the connection is done by target
address. For some reason, the destination is not matching the
connection. Try to print $nh(u) before relaying to see where it is
supposed to be sent.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15.04.20 16:54, Mack Hendricks wrote:
Hello,
I’m running kamailio 5.1.10 (x86_64/linux)
The connection_id in usrloc is -1 for some reason so the id doesn’t
match for sure. But, I thought that it would match on the received
address of the WS client because the output from ws.dump shows that
the connection address and port matches the received address and
port in usrloc.
Any suggestions?
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda On Apr 15, 2020, at 10:48 AM, Daniel-Constantin
Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
what version of Kamailio do you use?
That message is printed when the connection is not found by id or
by destination address.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 15.04.20 07:11, Mack Hendricks wrote:
> Hey All,
>
>
>
> I get this message when trying to route request to a WebSocket client:
>
>
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:1762]: check_boundaries(): no
> multi-part body
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> DEBUG: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:429]: clen_builder():
> content-length: 651 (651)
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> WARNING: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2786]: via_builder():
> *TCP/TLS connection (id: 0) for WebSocket could not be found*
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> ERROR: <core> [core/msg_translator.c:2002]:
> build_req_buf_from_sip_req(): could not create Via header
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:476]: prepare_new_uac(): could not build request
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1738]: t_forward_nonack(): failure to add branches
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:337]: t_relay_to(): t_forward_nonack returned
> error -2 (-2)
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:355]: t_relay_to(): -2 error reply generation
> delayed
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1176 a=24 n=sl_reply_error
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:362]: sl_reply_error(): stateless error
> reply used: No error (2/SL)
> Apr 15 04:59:37 dSIP060entNightly-0 /usr/sbin/kamailio[22071]:
> exec: *** cfgtrace:request_route=[RELAY]
> c=[/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=1178 a=2 n=exit
>
>
>
> Here is what my location table looks like. It should try to send
> the call to * sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws*
>
>
> *************************** 2. row ***************************
> id: 124
> ruid: uloc-5e9685e8-5650-92
> username: 2000
> domain: ws-test.com <http://ws-test.com/>
> *contact: sips:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid
> <mailto:2000@df7jal23ls0d.invalid>;rtcweb-breaker=no;transport=wss
> received: sip:98.209.240.245:56291;transport=ws*
> path: NULL
> expires: 2020-04-15 05:03:17
> q: -1.00
> callid: 7ef0a550-b2b9-24c6-5c3b-8e0c667f5533
> cseq: 50096
> last_modified: 2020-04-15 04:59:57
> flags: 0
> cflags: 524352
> user_agent: IM-client/OMA1.0 sipML5-v1.2016.03.04
> socket: NULL
> methods: NULL
> instance: NULL
> reg_id: 0
> server_id: 0
> connection_id: -1
> keepalive: 1
> partition: 18
>
>
> *The Websocket list looks like this:*
>
>
> Server01:~# kamcmd ws.dump
> {
> connections: {
> *8: wss:98.209.240.245:56291 -> wss:134.122.27.49:4443 (state:
> OPEN, last used 47s ago, sub-protocol: sip)*
> }
> info: {
> wscounter: 1
> truncated: no
> }
> }
>
> *
> *
> *I’m not sure what I’m doing wrong. Any ideas?*
> *
> *
> *
> *
> Thanks in advance
>
> -Mack
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
> sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org
> https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda