10 Dec
2007
10 Dec
'07
3:09 p.m.
At 07:30 10/12/2007, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
Jiri Kuthan wrote:
debian installation does it too. Besides that it has a genuine
system of resolving dependencies, which makes upgrades painless,
which is the key advantage.
At 11:16 09/12/2007, Greger V. Teigre wrote:
I believe the m4 buildsystem is more suited for this project as it allows local
adaptations through answering a few questions.
Hi guys, thanks a bunch for lots of input and I really appreciate the willingness to
contribute.
Thus, I have created a "project page":
<http://www.iptel.org/sip_express_bundle_sip_service_in_15_minutes>http://www.iptel.org/sip_express_bundle_sip_service_in_15_minutes
I thought we could gather the current perspective on that page and document our decisions
as we go. It will hopefully be useful in our process, as well as documentation for us and
others later.
I have noted the following volunteers:
Jai: testing and installation work
ram: testing
SIP: tesing
Jiri: anyting?
we most likely will contribute with all-in-one debian packaging built on top of oob.
not sure how that fits in the wide desire for CentOs though :-)
However, as I have told you previously, I'm quite
agnostic when it comes to which config the buildsystem uses, and I have started the
process of joining the current gettingstarted config with ser-oob.
marvelllous.
-jiri
g-)
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/