Hello,

ok, thanks for testing. I backported to 5.3 as well.

There seemed to be an issue with the size of the variables used to match. Just for reference, I typically use $shv(x) variables these days if I need to set some value via rpc and test it in config, it is more or less like gflags, but you can have many and they can be controlled via rpc with pv.shvSet/Get from pv module.

Cheers,
Daniel

Hi Daniel,

Yes it's worked! Thank you very much for the quick response :)

Cheers,

Yufei

On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 15:59, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello,

try with the patch from commit:

  * https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/commit/5411eda4e44a487479d00433583a68a328aca9a3

Cheers,
Daniel

On 19.03.20 15:01, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:

Hello,

can you try:

kamcmd cfgutils.is_gflag i:1024

Cheers,
Daniel

On 19.03.20 12:12, Yufei Tao wrote:

Hi,

I got some problems with is_gflags:

1. Set the gflag:

# kamcmd cfgutils.set_gflag 1024

2. Check the gflags - fine:

# kamcmd cfgutils.get_gflags
0x400 (1024)

3. Check using is_gflag - problem:

# kamcmd cfgutils.is_gflag 1024
FALSE

Seems is_gflag always returns FALSE somehow. Calling function is_gflag() from the cfg file seems to always return FALSE too.

I tried this on Kamailio 5.3.2 and 5.3.3 and the behaviour is the same.

Best regards,

Yufei

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda

-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda