Re: [Users] failure route problem

Hi! I have a problem with my failure route. In the failure route, I send the call to voicemail, except the call is CANCELED by the caller: failure_route[1] { if(t_check_status("487")) { xlog("L_INFO","caller cancelled call, no voicemail needed...\n"); exit; } route(4); # route to voicemail } The problem is, when a call is forked and one of the destinations is busy or has any other reasons to not accept the call. /-------- <-486 phone1 / caller ----------------- <-488 phone2 \ \-------- <-487 phone3 In the above case, phone1 and 2 immedately response with an error message. Then several seconds later, the caller hangs up and now phone3 sends 487. If I now check the status in the failure route it will be 486 (the lowest one). Also any other algorithm (the highest one, the first one, the last one) would be ambiguous. Thus, deciding if the call will be sent to voicemail or not is not possible using t_check_status. AFAIK there is no other method to check the status of the transaction in the failure route. IMO this is an issue which should be solved. I suggest setting the status explicitly to "487" if the transaction was cancelled by the caller, independent of the resonse status received from the phones. regards klaus _______________________________________________ Users mailing list Users(a)openser.org http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users