14 Jun
2008
14 Jun
'08
2:13 a.m.
-----Original Message-----
From: users-bounces(a)lists.openser.org
[mailto:users-bounces@lists.openser.org] On Behalf Of Iñaki
Baz Castillo
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 6:35 PM
To: users(a)lists.openser.org
Subject: Re: [OpenSER-Users] Loose route problem or misunderstanding
El Miércoles, 11 de Junio de 2008, Watkins, Bradley escribió:
Apparently, it pays to read the documentation...
In particular, the entry in the core cookbook for alias:
"It is necessary to include the port (the port value used in the "port=" or
"listen=" defintions) in the alias definition otherwise the loose_route()
function will not work as expected for local forwards"
This was exactly my problem.
I'm not entirely sure I agree with assuming that OpenSER is responsible for EVERY
port, even when it's configure to only listen on one. But at any rate, changing a few
lines to include the port number makes this work for me so I won't complain too
loudly.
Thanks for taking the time to try and help me with this issue.
Regards,
- Brad
The remote target is on the same machine, but on
a
different port. OpenSER
is listening on 5060, Asterisk is listening on
5062.
You are completely right, sorry, I didn't realize on the
different port.
So a SIP trace of what happens in that machine would be
needed. Could you
provide a complete SIP flow? it's neccesary to see also the
flow between
OpenSer and Asterisk.