Hello,
can you check that the NOTIFY gets to the endpoint UA with Record-Route
headers?
Because I don't see the Record-Route headers in the response to the
first NOTIFY, the second NOTIFY being sent to the Contact address, which
is private and unroutable.
If the Record-Route set is not mirrored in the response of the NOTIFY,
then the UA has to be fixed.
You can eventually try to add record-route manually to the 200ok of the
NOTIFY using record_route_preset() if you know exactly what are the
local IPs involved in the signaling of the presence dialog and there are
no other proxies in the path.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 21:21, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Daniel,
I have record route in WITHINDLG for NOTIFY, but it not helped
behaviour is the same it loosing route for NOTIFY.
Slava.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*To: *"Slava Bendersky" <volga629(a)networklab.ca>ca>, "sr-users"
<sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
*Sent: *Wednesday, March 11, 2015 2:14:02 PM
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
you have to do record_route() for all NOTIFY requests -- there are new
specs requiring that (RFC 6665) and perhaps asterisk is following them.
If you look in the default kamailio.cfg for v4.2, inside
route[WITHINDLG], then you will see how it is done.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/03/15 14:22, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Daniel,
Here fresh paste
http://fpaste.org/196616/42608006/
I see proper routing headers on SUBSCRIBE, but then NOTIFY loose it.
Slava.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *"Daniel-Constantin Mierla" <miconda(a)gmail.com>
*To: *"sr-users" <sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org>
*Sent: *Tuesday, March 10, 2015 5:31:51 PM
*Subject: *Re: [SR-Users] kamailio asterisk NOTIFY
Hello,
fpaste link doesn't show anything.
Can you check if the NOTIFY coming to Kamailio has two Route headers?
Cheers,
Daniel
On 10/03/15 18:44, Slava Bendersky wrote:
Hello Everyone,
Having issue with NOTIFY, is not forwarded to client properly.
asterisk ---> private kamailio public ----> soft client
http://fpaste.org/196257/99948714/
I see kamailio trying connect always with private IP to the
client when NOTIFY is come is in. Is this something to do with
rr_advertise_address ?
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core>
[tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect
192.168.88.246:5064 failed (timeout)
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core>
[tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout
for 0x7fbbb64e2800
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core>
[io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00,
33, -1, 0x10) fd_no=24 called
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core>
[tcp_main.c:4320]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: entering
timer for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0 (ticks=839577436, timeout=839634956
(3595 s), wr_timeout=839577436 (0 s)), write queue: 798 bytes
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) ERROR: <core>
[tcp_main.c:4338]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): connect
192.168.88.246:5066 failed (timeout)
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core>
[tcp_main.c:4362]: tcpconn_main_timeout(): tcp_main: timeout
for 0x7fbbb64eb6c0
Mar 10 13:44:23 canlvprx01 kamailio: 16(24971) DEBUG: <core>
[io_wait.h:610]: io_watch_del(): DBG: io_watch_del (0x9dbf00,
34, -1, 0x10) fd_no=23 called
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm
[t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response():
->>>>>>>>>
T_code=0, new_code=408
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm
[t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0,
save=0, relay=0 icode=0
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: <core>
[mem/shm_mem.c:111]: _shm_resize(): WARNING:vqm_resize:
resize(0) called
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm
[t_reply.c:1294]: t_should_relay_response():
->>>>>>>>>
T_code=0, new_code=408
Mar 10 13:44:42 canlvprx01 kamailio: 5(24960) DEBUG: tm
[t_reply.c:1812]: relay_reply(): DEBUG: relay_reply: branch=0,
save=0, relay=0 icode=0
I have in configuration in WITHINDLG
if (is_method("NOTIFY")) {
record_route();
}
and in NATDETECT
if(is_method("INVITE|SUBSCRIBE|UPDATE|NOTIFY")) {
set_contact_alias();
}
Slava.
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany -
http://www.kamailioworld.com
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda -
http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Kamailio World Conference, May 27-29, 2015
Berlin, Germany -
http://www.kamailioworld.com