22 aug 2013 kl. 10:37 skrev Alex Balashov abalashov@evaristesys.com:
On 08/22/2013 04:34 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
22 aug 2013 kl. 10:27 skrev Alex Balashov abalashov@evaristesys.com:
On 08/22/2013 04:25 AM, Olle E. Johansson wrote:
Guessing that a URI with a user name should be forwarded to that address. URIs pointing to the domain of the server should be responded by the server.
Yes, but shouldn't sip:user@proxy_ip and sip:proxy_ip both be serviced by the server?
If it's to an IP address I would answer 404 Not Found to both, SIP is domain based :-)
user@ip is propably a 404, but yes, if a UA use this for keepalive we should propably answer - but in that case you don't really need a full options answer, just any 200 Ok will do. Or?
Sure, which is why the stateless 200 OK solution works.
But it seems to me that options_reply() ought to answer with a 404 Not Found; it's what other UASs (like Asterisk) do...
The Asterisk answer depends on your dialplan :-)
/O