Re: [Serusers] TLS support in SER

Hi Klaus, That's a good Question :p I've never tried it.. Hopefully it works :-) Regarding Cesc's answer,, I dont have the slightest clue if it would update the timer.. but, I guess it would :-)

-Atle * Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> [060127 13:40]: >So the question is: Does natping also works with TCP and TLS? Has someone > ever tried this? > >regards >klaus > >Cesc wrote: >>I have never tried because we don't have nats in my project. Now, if >>the natping thing updates de expire-timer that the ser tcp core keeps >>(in the tcp_conn object list), then there is no problem. >>I mean, the problem is not the nat machine closing the binding ... the >>problem is ser executing a "close" on the socket. This may either then >>shutdown the nat binding, or in most end-points mean that no incoming >>connections can be accepted (most end-points do not support incoming >>tls call establishment ... they can only connect to a tls server, that >>is, a sip proxy). >>Regards, >>Cesc >> >>On 1/27/06, Atle Samuelsen <clona(a)cyberhouse.no> wrote: >>>Hi Cesc, >>> >>>cant this be "fixed" with haveing the natping from server-side? (like >>>sending options requests every say 80 sec? (or even more if you adjust >>>it in the ser's source?) >>> >>>-Atle >>> >>>* Cesc <cesc.santa(a)gmail.com> [060127 09:19]: >>>>Mmm ... one comes to mind ... >>>>ser/openser will close the tcp/tls connection after a couple minutes >>>>of inactivity by the phone ... thus, you either change this in ser's >>>>source code or you force your phone to re-register every 90 seconds or >>>>so ... otherwise, the tcp/tls connection is closed, thus the phone >>>>cannot be reached (for incoming calls). >>>> >>>>Cesc >>>> >>>>On 1/25/06, Yi Zheng <yizheng(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote: >>>>>thanks for the pointer. >>>>> >>>>>Are there known issues for TCP+TLS to work across NAT? The few NAT >>>>> travesal sloutions I am aware of such as STUN, nathelper+rtp proxy >>>>> seem to work with UDP only. >>>>> >>>>>- ming >>>>> >>>>>Klaus Darilion <klaus.mailinglists(a)pernau.at> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>Yi Zheng wrote: >>>>>>Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>>I am wondering whether SER has any support for TLS as a security >>>>>>mechanism? Thanks, >>>>> >>>>>Yes. It is in the experimental tree: >>>>>http://cvs.berlios.de/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/ser/experimental/tls/ >>>>> >>>>>You can also try openser, which has TLS integrated in the stable >>>>> version 1.0.0 >>>>> >>>>>regards >>>>>klaus >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>>Serusers mailing list >>>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Serusers mailing list >>>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Serusers mailing list >>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers