5 Jul
2005
5 Jul
'05
2:39 p.m.
I dont know what this means for your accounting solution. I just told you that
481's are not so unusual (allthough that heavily depends on the definition of
usual) and not a hint for a broken configuration.
Nils
On Tuesday 05 July 2005 13:26, Iqbal wrote:
but then I have two BYE in the acc table, so is it
correct to ignore the
one with the 481, rather than the one with 200
Iqbal
Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>Dont worry, 481's are absolutely normal e.g. for crossing BYE's. (If both
>parties send the BYE at the same time, one or both parties can answer with
>481.)
>481 for INVITE requests would be a little bit more strange.
>
> Nils
>
>On Monday 04 July 2005 18:29, Iqbal wrote:
>>Hi
>>
>>I seem to be getting a a few 481 in my logs, and was wondering is this
>>purely a client problem, or could I have something wrong in my ser.cfg
>>in terms of how I am handling the dialogue
>>
>>Iqbal
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serusers mailing list
>>serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>
>.