Re: [SR-Users] rtpproxy module flags 1 and 2 question

Juha Heinanen writes:

is the setup without the 1/2 flags like this:

uac invite -> proxy -> invite -> proxy -> invite -> first uas -> cancel -> proxy -> cancel -> first uas -> invite -> second uas where second proxy instance calls unforce_rtpproxy when it receives the cancel, thus tearing down also the rtpproxy session for the second leg?

is so, why would second proxy instance be involved with rtpproxy stuff at all because that has been already taken care of by the first instance?

or is it so that first proxy instance didn't arm rtpproxy, but second instance did and then first instance armed rtpproxy for second uas before second instance unarmed it due to cancel?

-- juha