2007/5/14, Jiri Kuthan <jiri@iptel.org >:

As for me I am largely in favor of having a kind of config-file "super-store" or "exchange" -- it
appears there is never enough of those :-)

-jiri

At 18:01 14/05/2007, Alfred E. Heggestad wrote:
>Hi Nils
>
>It would be very useful to have 1 (one) big configuration file implementing
>a superset of the most popular features (nathelper, tls, presence etc..)
>and split into logical parts, so people can remove/disable unwanted features.
>
>If you can publish the ser.cfg for the SER running on sip: iptel.org that would
>be even better.. Nothing beats a working config from long-term deployment.
>
>I am currently also assisting Greger now, to get the ser.cfg build system
>up2dated with working configuration files..
>
>
>/alfred
>
>Nils Ohlmeier wrote:
>>Hello everybody,
>>as we want to provide more examples for the configuration the following the question came up:
>>Do you prefer
>>- one big example configuration
>>  - probably harder to understand
>>  - easier to maintain for us
>>- one example config file per "feature"
>>  - probably easier to understand your desired "feature"
>>  - you might have problems to integrate all your desired "features" into one config without breaking anything
>>  - harder to maintain for us, as we have to update several files :-)
>>As the configuration examples are indented to be for the community, I would like to know what you prefer or if you see other options.
>>Thanks
>>  Nils
>>_______________________________________________
>>Serdev mailing list
>>Serdev@lists.iptel.org
>> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Serdev mailing list
>Serdev@lists.iptel.org
>http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev

--
Jiri Kuthan            http://iptel.org/~jiri/

_______________________________________________
Serdev mailing list
Serdev@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev