21 Feb
2014
21 Feb
'14
1:32 a.m.
On 2/20/14, 6:25 PM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
Fred,
in you ACME replacement, kamailio doesn’t rewrite headers for handling
RTP/SIGNALING and stay in the middle?
For nat it did. For others the media server did.
You can easily force all connections to use rtpproxy to do what you ask.
We chose to do this for NAT and for media servers outside of kamailio to
be the other choice. All calls were on one, the other, or both.
--
Fred Posner | The Palner Group, Inc.
http://qxork.com
Il giorno 21/feb/2014, alle ore 00:03, Fred Posner <fred(a)palner.com
<mailto:fred@palner.com>> ha scritto:
On 2/20/14, 5:55 PM, Francesco Maria Magnini
wrote:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
@Carsten
I looked athttp://www.iptel.org/semsand seems to be only broken links
to downloads.
Do you know if the project is still maintained?
@Fred
Are you using openser as a B2BUA?
No, because of course Kamailio is not a b2bua. =)
In the case of the ACME replacement, we used it to:
- handle NAT (rtpproxy)
- user regs
- load balance
- lcr
- security
- routing
and some other little hacks.
--
Fred Posner | The Palner Group, Inc.
http://qxork.com <http://qxork.com/>
Il giorno 20/feb/2014, alle ore 19:42, Fred Posner <fred(a)palner.com
<mailto:fred@palner.com>> ha scritto:
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users Alex's article is one of my favorites. That
being said, we switched
out an Acme SBC for openser (at the time) and was immediately thrilled.
Fred Posner
The Palner Group, Inc.
503-914-0999 (direct)
954-472-2896 (fax)
On 02/20/2014 01:14 PM, Alex Balashov wrote:
> Francesco,
>
> Have a look at this blog post:
>
> http://www.likewise.am/2013/03/kamailio-as-an-sbc-session-border-controller/
>
>
> That said, I agree with Carsten's suggestion of SEMS.
>
> On 02/20/2014 11:04 AM, Francesco Maria Magnini wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I would like to have some suggestions about a full replacement of an
>> ACME Packet Net-Net Session Border Controller.
>> By now, ACME SBC performs all the SBC functionalities, mainly:
>>
>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for SIP client registrations
>> - it is used as a SIP endpoint for interconnection to multiple SIP
>> carriers via SIP trunks
>> - it is used for NAT traversal
>>
>> In this deployment, the SIP Server communicates only with the SBC and
>> this one takes care of the communication between the SIP Server and
>> the external SIP entities (UA clients, SIP Trunks).
>> In this scenario, can I consider to replace the SBC with Kamailio?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing
>> list
>> sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org
>> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
_______________________________________________
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users(a)lists.sip-router.org <mailto:sr-users@lists.sip-router.org>
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users