El Miércoles, 3 de Febrero de 2010, brandon@cryy.com escribió:
I do see all the behavior as referenced, however the actual problem is upon receipt of the invite to the UAC, in which it responds with 200 OK and Contact of RFC1918 address, in which is not being fix natted contact because at this point kamailio is not aware of the UAC being behind nat due to the reinvite passing the nat uac test because we can not tell with the invite coming downstream from PSTN, however can only tell upon receipt of 200 ok back from client.
Let me know if this all makes sense and if there is something I am still missing.
I don't get still what you mean. With the approach I told in my previos message communication is possible for all the re-INVITE's (coming from the PSTN or from the UA behind NAT).