[SR-Users] Re: SL absorbed ACK is counted as dropped by core.drop_requests

Just following up on this; Should an ACK absorbed by the SL module get counted as a dropped request? Kaufman From: Kaufman <bkaufman(a)bcmone.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2023 6:52 PM To: Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List <sr-users(a)lists.kamailio.org> Subject: [SR-Users] SL absorbed ACK is counted as dropped by core.drop_requests CAUTION: This email originated from outside the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Just checking to see if this is the designed behavior. The SL module will attempt to match ACKs for stateless replies and handle them (absorb them?). The question I have is that it looks as though this ACK gets counted as dropped by the core.drop_requests from the KEX module. Tested using this config: #!KAMAILIO loadmodule "pv" loadmodule "sl" loadmodule "xlog" loadmodule "kex" loadmodule "corex" loadmodule "ctl" modparam("sl", "bind_tm", 0) route { xinfo("[$ci] $rm Request. Src:[$si:$sp] RURI:[$ru] To:[$tu] From:[$fu]\n"); sl_send_reply("404", "Not Found"); } event_route[sl:filtered-ack] { xnotice("sl:filtered-ack ACK [$ci] to local reply absorbed\n"); } Then validate by kamcmd stats.fetch core:drop_requests Is this the designed and "correct" behavior? Kaufman