4 Mar
2008
4 Mar
'08
5:30 a.m.
Hi Juha,
Well,.... this links to a discussion from more than an year ago - moving
the parallel2serial converter and serial forking support from lcr to
core. Already there are 2 core functions that are doing the same (more
or less) and I will really like to see this step completed and remove
the serialization support from lcr module - as you said, the module
grows, and it should keep focused on the LCR functionality.
Regarding the q issue - I agree with your approach - instead of hacking
the serialization engine, better play with q values before serialization.
Is any common will on the first item (serialization to be moved out from
LCR)? Because, if so, we should work out a plan of action.
Regards,
Bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
a few days ago there was a question on if lcr module
is able to
serialize parallel forking of branches with the same q value. i
replied that there is no such capability in lcr module.
now that i have thought about the matter a bit, in my opinion the best
solution is to write a separate serialize function that rewrites the q
values rather than trying adding yet another feature to already too
complex lcr module.
-- juha
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)lists.openser.org
http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users