Hi Juha,
Well,.... this links to a discussion from more than an year ago - moving the parallel2serial converter and serial forking support from lcr to core. Already there are 2 core functions that are doing the same (more or less) and I will really like to see this step completed and remove the serialization support from lcr module - as you said, the module grows, and it should keep focused on the LCR functionality.
Regarding the q issue - I agree with your approach - instead of hacking the serialization engine, better play with q values before serialization.
Is any common will on the first item (serialization to be moved out from LCR)? Because, if so, we should work out a plan of action.
Regards, Bogdan
Juha Heinanen wrote:
a few days ago there was a question on if lcr module is able to serialize parallel forking of branches with the same q value. i replied that there is no such capability in lcr module.
now that i have thought about the matter a bit, in my opinion the best solution is to write a separate serialize function that rewrites the q values rather than trying adding yet another feature to already too complex lcr module.
-- juha
Users mailing list Users@lists.openser.org http://lists.openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users