17 Sep
2007
17 Sep
'07
3:33 p.m.
Thanks Jiri for your answer. I think the LCR should be the best way to
do what I want. We don't need an appliance for load-balancing, for the
moment.
I we need this one day, I will contact you to get products informations.
Thanks all for your support.
Le lundi 17 septembre 2007 à 14:02 +0200, Jiri Kuthan a écrit :
At 20:15 13/09/2007, Jai Rangi wrote:
This is very elegant,
However we are using lcr module for load distribution. The advantage is that if one server
is not available/busy then ser will send call to another.
This advantage is available with DNS and SER too.
(Just FYI, I think lcr is same good for this purpose.)
-jiri
--
Jiri Kuthan http://iptel.org/~jiri/
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers