Re: [Serusers] problem with compiling the new CVS release

Is there any policy about commiting changes that do not compile?

Samuel. 2007/4/2, Michal Matyska <michal(a)iptel.org>rg>: >Hi, > >cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser checkout -D >20070328 sip_router > >works for me (the -D option must appear after the checkout command, not >before) or use the stable branch. > >Michal > > >On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 10:50 +0300, ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: >> Thank you, >> >> Trying right now... >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jan Janak [mailto:jan@iptel.org] >> Sent: Monday, April 02, 2007 10:08 AM >> To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) >> Cc: Michal Matyska; serusers(a)iptel.org >> Subject: Re: [Serusers] problem with compiling the new CVS release >> >> Hello, >> >> Get the code from the 2.0 branch: >> >> cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser checkout -r >rel_2_0_0 sip_router >> >> Jan. >> >> ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) wrote: >> > Hi Michal, >> > >> > Thank you for your reply. >> > I didn't understand what to do. Should I add the option to the command >"cvs -d :pserver:anonymous@cvs.berlios.de:/cvsroot/ser checkout >sip_router" ? >> > I gues not, because it does not accept that parameter. >> > >> > What should I do now ? >> > Should I download a stable version ? Where can I find a stable version >with presence support ? >> > >> > In fact, I only need the new registrar module which includes >"nat_flag" parameter. >> > But when I just add the new registrar module to my old sources, I >can't compile it. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > ilker >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Michal Matyska [mailto:michal@iptel.org] >> > Sent: Saturday, March 31, 2007 10:01 PM >> > To: ?lker Aktuna (Koç.net) >> > Cc: serusers(a)iptel.org >> > Subject: Re: [Serusers] problem with compiling the new CVS release >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Sorry for the inconvinience... checkout the CVS code before the DB API >started to change (e.g. add -D 20070328 option to the cvs co command). >> > >> > Until all modules will be changed and using new API, it won't compile >for a while. >> > >> > Michal >> > >> > On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 11:48 +0200, Jan Janak wrote: >> >> Folks, >> >> >> >> I have been working on a new database abstraction layer for SER for a >> >> while and I'll start commiting it in CVS now. Please excuse me if >> >> something is broken temporarily, this is a major improvement that >> >> touches all modules that use the database. This change does not >> >> affect Ottendorf, of course. The new DB layer will appear in 2.1 >> >> >> >> The main objectives for doing major changes in the DB API are: >> >> >> >> 1) Better support for databases that are not based on SQL, like >> >> Berkeley db, LDAP, and fas in-memory databases. >> >> >> >> 2) The new code will no more store fetch all data from the database >> >> in one step, it will be possible to get the data row by row (common >> >> problem in usrloc) >> >> >> >> 3) Support for queries over multiple databases with various strategies >> >> (i.e. usrloc database can be partitioned). >> >> >> >> 4) Support for database failover (i.e. if the primary database fails >> >> that SER can start using another one, which can be even of >different >> >> type, i.e. mysql->postgres) >> >> >> >> I provide you with more details and documentation later once the >> >> first version is in CVS. >> >> >> >> Jan. >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> Serdev mailing list >> >> Serdev(a)lists.iptel.org >> >> http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serdev >> > ______________________________________________________________________ > >_______________________________________________ >Serusers mailing list >Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org >http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers >

_______________________________________________ Serusers mailing list Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers