At 06:04 PM 3/3/2008, Jiri Kuthan wrote:
So what was the issues that were out-of-order .... was it modules that have not been migrated to the new DB-API yet, or even more?
Both of the above. The out of order was my cause and easily resolved. The "not been migrated" . lcr was the important one. I just skipped it for now and did something simple in the ser.cfg to simulate lcr.
Would you be willing/interested in looking at the OOB and Ai1 deb packages and testing those and/or porting those to RH? I think they now greatly help to define a self-contained system, but they haven't really been tested or fine-tuned.
I can do this.
For practice, I have taken several CVS snapshots for ser / ser_ctl and have built them on RH (CentOS/5, FC6, FC7). FC8 is next on my list. On the earlier FC6 I had some yum updates for tshark and tools. FC7 all seems ok. Expect FC8 to also be OK. I have not yet ventured into SERWEB or SEMS trying to stay focused on learning the basics. I look forward to those two as well.
For further practice, I have written and am testing a new module for something that interested me. Runs well. I may have a question for you regarding AVP and my new module. Or shall I just toss the question to the serdev list?
Therefore, I feel comfortable enough to port from DEB to RH/FCx. Do you have a CVS/svn repository for all the pieces?
..mike..
Thanks a lot!
-jiri