Hm, 480 should be used for DND, I think. AFAIK, SJPhone should use 486, not sure about the others.
g-)

Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com wrote:

Ser uses ‘486 busy here’ for busy notifications which is correct according to rfc but sip phones like x-lite, 3CX Phone, SJPhone uses ‘480 temp unavailable here’ for the same !!!!

 

Regards

Kamal Mann


From: Greger V. Teigre [mailto:greger@teigre.com]
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 8:19 PM
To: Mann, Kamal
Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd

 

You do lookup("aliases") and lookup("location") AFTER you have changed the uri through avp_pushto from usr_preferences.
Is this really what you want?
g-)

Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com wrote:

 
Hi All
I want to setup Blind call forwarding.  Like if a uri - mann@iptel.org
is not registered with SER but this user had already configured in ser
database table usr_prefrences that his call should be forwarde to
another uri kamal@iptel.org. For that my usr_prefrence table is like
 
 
  
USR_PREFRENCES table
 
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
    
+
  
---------------+
 
| uuid | username | domain    | attribute | value               | type
    
|
  
modified       |
 
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
    
+
  
----------------+
 
|      | bhaskar  | debian    | callfwd   | kamal@iptel.org
|    0 | 20060926165852 |
 
|      | mann     | iptel.org | callfwd   | sip:kamal@iptel.org |    0
    
|
  
20060926150443 |
 
|      | prateek  | iptel.org | callfwd   | kamal@iptel.org     |    0
    
|
  
20060926170701 |
 
+------+----------+-----------+-----------+---------------------+------
    
+
  
----------------+
    
 
 
Is this entry is correct?? Is there any flaw in my ser.cfg??
Any help would be appreciated.
Regards
Kamal Mann
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Blair [mailto:blairs@isc.upenn.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 27, 2006 2:26 PM
To: Mann, Kamal
Cc: serusers@lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
 
 
 
Does your config file relay REFER messages? It needs to in order to 
perform the transfer.
 
Kamal.Mann@t-systems.com wrote:
 
  
Hi all
 
Please help out
 
 
    
------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
*From:* Mann, Kamal
*Sent:* Tuesday, September 26, 2006 5:46 PM
*To:* 'serusers@lists.iptel.org'
*Subject:* RE: [Serusers] Implementing call fwd
 
Hi all
 
I am implementing Blind call forwarding with 0.9.6 SER version. But 
with current configuration it's not working. Please help on same.
 
I am enclosing small part of usr_prefrences table & my ser.cfg.
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
    
-
  
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
 
 
    
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers@lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers