28 Mar
2005
28 Mar
'05
4:51 p.m.
Paul,
You are absolutely correct. For some reason, I found the offending block to
be this.
if (src_ip==193.175.135.0/24){
force_send_socket(smaug:5080);
forward(193.175.135.179);
break;
}
it is part of the original config and I did not even modify it. when I
delete this block, everything started. Any ideas?
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: Java Rockx [mailto:javarockx@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:43 AM
To: Alex Vishnev
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] Problem starting ser 0.9.0
Error -478 usually indicates that there is an invalid IP address in
your ser.cfg file.
Regards,
Paul
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:37:39 -0500, Alex Vishnev <avishnev(a)optonline.net>
wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to start ser 0.9.0 on linux rh 9.0. the only thing I modified
in
ser.cfg is listen address and debug information.
However, I am getting an
error starting ser
debug=3 # debug level (cmd line: -dddddddddd)
fork=no
log_stderror=yes
listen=64.243.115.157
# hostname matching an alias will satisfy the condition uri==myself".
alias=64.243.115.157
check_via=no # (cmd. line: -v)
dns=no # (cmd. line: -r)
rev_dns=no # (cmd. line: -R)
port=5060
#children=4
fifo="/tmp/ser_fifo"
the error I am getting is
[root@voip ser]# ser
Listening on
udp: 64.243.115.157 [64.243.115.157]:5060
tcp: 64.243.115.157 [64.243.115.157]:5060
Aliases:
tcp: voip:5060
udp: voip:5060
*: 64.243.115.157:*
WARNING: no fork mode
stateless - initializing
0(0) Maxfwd module- initializing
ERROR: error -478 while trying to fix configuration
I think it is failing on this line in the config file but I don't know
why.
# initial sanity checks -- messages with
# max_forwards==0, or excessively long requests
if (!mf_process_maxfwd_header("10")) {
sl_send_reply("483","Too Many Hops");
break;
};
Any Ideas?
Alex
-----Original Message-----
From: serusers-bounces(a)iptel.org [mailto:serusers-bounces@lists.iptel.org] On
Behalf Of Java Rockx
Sent: Monday, March 28, 2005 9:29 AM
To: Marian Dumitru
Cc: serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
Subject: Re: [Serusers] uac_auth module??
Thank you very kindly sir!
Regards,
Paul
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:31:41 +0200, Marian Dumitru
<marian.dumitru(a)voice-sistem.ro> wrote:
Hi Paul,
There is no uac_auth module - uac_auth is a function within the UAC
module.
The UAC module contains more UAC feature than
from replacement - see
Ramona's email from original commit; also please refer to the module
README to find more about its capabilities.
Best regards,
Marian
Java Rockx wrote:
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
Have either of you seen that post in the forum
asking where to find
something called the "uac_auth" module?
If so can you reply to that post dated 2005/3/14 ?
I did some Google searching and cannot find any mention of the module.
I don't think the poster is referring to the new uac module in CVS
head for altering the <From> header.
Regards,
Paul
--
Voice System
http://www.voice-system.ro