Hi again,

Sorry, false alarm...

We had a patch which disabled the callback from dialog to RR.

Regards,

Kristian.

On Friday 27 November 2015 12:54:50 Kristian F. Høgh wrote:

> Hi list,

>

> Record-route on sequential requests doesn't have did/vsf parm.

>

> On initial INVITE, I call record_route() and set dialog flag.

> kamailio adds the following RR

> Record-Route: <sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2>

>

> UAC sends a re-INVITE, containing the following route:

> Route: <sip:178.21.251.54;lr;ftag=15af612df;vsf=AAAA....;did=4a8.3ca2>

> I call loose_route() followed by record-route(), and kamailio adds the following RR:

> Record-Route: <sip:ww.xx.yy.zz;lr;ftag=15af612df>

>

> I've got a phone which updates the routeset on sequential requests (which I don't think it should) and the did-matching fails.

> Should kamailio add did/vsf on sequential requests, when I call record_route()?

> Should I set dlg_match_mode to 1? (I use 0)

> Is it wrong to call record_route() from sequential requests?

>

> Which way is the best to resolve the problem?

>

> Regards,

> Kristian Høgh

> Uni-tel A/S

>

--

Kristian Høgh

Telefon: 4422 8822

support@uni-tel.dk

Gydevang 19 | 3450 Allerød

www.uni-tel.dk