Here is the message dump that i get when using
TCP as transport.
>
> On 5/3/07, Jiri Kuthan <jiri(a)iptel.org> wrote:
>> I think you would have to send message dumps first so that [serusers] volunteers
>> have material for providing an answer.
>>
>> -jiri
>>
>> At 12:07 03/05/2007, KUMAR wrote:
>>> -
>>> Hi all,
>>> I already posted this message yet havent got any replies. I really
>>> need to find this out.
>>> Please anyone reply to this problem.
>>>
>>> I am using SER-0.9.6 and the problem i'm having is this. When using
>>> the following ser.cfg, it works well when the transport UDP is used.
>>> But when transport TCP is used, then it only results in one way IM,
>>> only from the UA from which the INVITE is being sent. Moreover, when
>>> record_route is used instead of record_route_preset, then even that
>>> one way IM doesn't work. But it works well with UDP.
>>>
>>> Can anyone please point me as to where the problem might be??
>>> Thank you in advance.
>>>
>>> kumar
>>>
>>>
>>> Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name=ser.cfg
>>> X-Attachment-Id: f_f18sg2bl
>>> Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="ser.cfg"
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Serusers mailing list
>>> Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
>>>
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
>>
>>
>> --
>> Jiri Kuthan
http://iptel.org/~jiri/
>>
>>
Content-Type: audio/x-pn-realaudio-plugin; name="msg_dump.rar"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="msg_dump.rar"
X-Attachment-Id: f_f1949112
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org