22 Nov
2005
22 Nov
'05
5:16 p.m.
Hi Christophe,
if you use nathelper and rtpproxy on the server, you do not need STUN.
You may use STUN in combination, just to reduce the cases that requires
media relying....but again, you do not need it.
nathelper + rtpproxy may ensure a 100% nat traversal solution.
regards,
bogdan
Christophe Irles wrote:
Hi,
Is the use of a STUN server or any other solution of this type (another
daemon) still mandatory to solve NAT problem since I have set up correctly
a media proxy and the netHelper module in my configuration file ? If it's
not the case which type of configuration is out of the scope if my server is
in this configuration ?
For example for this network configuration, is a STUN server with UA
compatible mandatory ?
UA1 --- [openSER+MediaProxy+FW wiht NAT] --- [ Internet ] --- [ FW/NAT ] ---
UA2
If it the case, which module(s) must be used with openSER and which STUN
server (open source/free) can be used ?
I already tested that this network configuration is working without any STUN
server
UA1 --- [openSER+MediaProxy+FW wiht NAT] --- [Internet] --- [FW] ---
UA2(softphone on PC with direct access on internet)
Thanks,
Christophe
_______________________________________________
Users mailing list
Users(a)openser.org
http://openser.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users