11 Sep
2006
11 Sep
'06
9:28 p.m.
Yet again, we see the value of having good documentation.
Rtpproxy's is somewhat... lacking. Having a comment in code or in the
changelog does not equate to good documentation.
N.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:52:54 -0400, Andres wrote
olivier.taylor wrote:
wow greger,
where is the doc about that fonctionality?
Wich version are we talking about?
* 2005-02-24 Added support for using more than one rtp proxy, in which
* case traffic will be distributed evenly among them.
In addition, * each such proxy can be assigned a weight,
which will specify * which share of the traffic should
be placed to this particular * proxy. * *
Introduce failover mechanism, so that if SER detects that one *
of many proxies is no longer available it temporarily decreases
* its weight to 0, so that no traffic will be assigned
to it. * Such "disabled" proxies are periodically
checked to see if they * are back to normal in which
case respective weight is restored * resulting in
traffic being sent to that proxy again. * * Those
features can be enabled by specifying more than one "URI" *
in the rtpproxy_sock parameter, optionally followed by the
weight, * which if absent is assumed to be 1, for example:
*
* rtpproxy_sock="unix:/foo/bar=4 udp:1.2.3.4:3456=3
udp:5.6.7.8:5432=1"
This has been available for over a year now.
Olivier
Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
--
Andres
Technical Support
http://www.telesip.net
_______________________________________________
Serusers mailing list
Serusers(a)lists.iptel.org
http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers FYI: The newest version of rtpproxy can do load
balancing...
g-)