Yet again, we see the value of having good documentation.
Rtpproxy's is somewhat... lacking. Having a comment in code or in the changelog does not equate to good documentation.
N.
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006 13:52:54 -0400, Andres wrote
olivier.taylor wrote:
wow greger,
where is the doc about that fonctionality? Wich version are we talking about?
- 2005-02-24 Added support for using more than one rtp proxy, in which
case traffic will be distributed evenly among them.In addition, * each such proxy can be assigned a weight, which will specify * which share of the traffic should be placed to this particular * proxy. * * Introduce failover mechanism, so that if SER detects that one * of many proxies is no longer available it temporarily decreases
its weight to 0, so that no traffic will be assignedto it. * Such "disabled" proxies are periodically checked to see if they * are back to normal in which case respective weight is restored * resulting in traffic being sent to that proxy again. * * Those features can be enabled by specifying more than one "URI" * in the rtpproxy_sock parameter, optionally followed by the weight, * which if absent is assumed to be 1, for example:
rtpproxy_sock="unix:/foo/bar=4 udp:1.2.3.4:3456=3udp:5.6.7.8:5432=1"
This has been available for over a year now.
Olivier
Greger V. Teigre a écrit :
FYI: The newest version of rtpproxy can do load balancing... g-)
-- Andres Technical Support http://www.telesip.net
Serusers mailing list Serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers