Hello,
On 8/23/13 8:33 PM, Steve Davies wrote:
On 23 August 2013 19:42, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <miconda@gmail.com mailto:miconda@gmail.com> wrote:
Can you try the new patch attached? I overlooked that the code where to skip sending the reply was in between some #ifdef ... #else ... #endif and I did it only for the #else branch, but actually the #ifdef was enabled by compile. You have to apply the patch on clean sources.Hi,
I now get the -4, thanks!
Aug 23 20:25:22 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5645]: NOTICE:
<script>: SLD: in RELAY, t_relay returned -4 err.rcode is <null> t_r_c is 100 sent = 0 FWIW, I had an sl_reply_error() after the t_relay and it decided to send back a 500. Which probably doesn't matter for me since I will go on and try my alternate routing. But is there a way to get hold of that "-477", and get the sl_reply_error to use the 477 ?
Not at this moment, but can be eventually added as t_reply_error(), as there is an internal variable holding that code.
Btw, after using t_relay() in this case, is better to use send_reply(...) instead of sl_send_reply(...), to clean the transaction gracefully in case the appropriate structure was created.
Cheers, Daniel
Thanks, Steve
Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: ERROR: tm [../../forward.h:196]: msg_send(): msg_send: ERROR: udp_send failed Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: DEBUG: tm [t_fwd.c:1369]: t_send_branch(): t_send_branch: send to 41.221.230.60:5060 http://41.221.230.60:5060 (1) failed Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1387]: t_send_branch(): ERROR: t_send_branch: sending request on branch 0 failed Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:357]: t_relay_to(): ERROR:tm:t_relay_to: t_forward_nonack returned error Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: DEBUG: tm [t_funcs.c:365]: t_relay_to(): not generating immediate reply for error -477 Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=562 a=26 n=xlog Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1100]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: msg id=5 global id=5 T start=0xb2f7ef18 Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: DEBUG: tm [t_lookup.c:1172]: t_check_msg(): DEBUG: t_check_msg: T already found! Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: DEBUG: tmx [t_var.c:467]: pv_get_tm_reply_code(): reply code is <100> Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: NOTICE:
<script>: SLD: in RELAY, t_relay returned -4 err.rcode is <null> t_r_c is 100 sent = 0 Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=566 a=16 n=if Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=564 a=24 n=sl_reply_error Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: DEBUG: <core> [msg_translator.c:206]: check_via_address(): check_via_address(172.16.230.1, 172.16.230.1, 0) Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: ERROR: sl [sl_funcs.c:371]: sl_reply_error(): ERROR: sl_reply_error used: I'm terribly sorry, server error occurr ed (1/SL) Aug 23 20:25:44 ubuntu /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[5646]: ERROR: *** cfgtrace: c=[/usr/local/etc/kamailio/kamailio.cfg] l=566 a=2 n=exit