22 Jan
2015
22 Jan
'15
11:05 a.m.
On Wednesday 21 January 2015 23:52:46 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
It is an ACK for a negative response, therefore it is
hop-by-hop
(received and discared by kamailio, then a new one is generated to the
next hop). The information of direction which was detected with Route
header ftag cannot be done in this case. I will try to figure out how
can be solved...
Am I to naive to think that these ACKs to negatives always (callid masking and
whether topoh is active or not) need to use the Call-ID from the negative (in
this case 488) response? Call-ID has only to be rewritten in forwarding the
negative response towards the endpoint that triggered it (which is done
correctly in my call trace)
--
Telefoon: 088 0100 700
Sales: sales(a)pocos.nl | Service: servicedesk(a)pocos.nl
http://www.pocos.nl/ | Croy 9c, 5653 LC Eindhoven | Kamer van Koophandel
17097024