On Thursday 17 January 2008 18:46:17 Peter P GMX wrote:
the 302 message is as follows
=====================
In this case it answers per UPD as I explained before when OpenSER
T 10.10.2.13:5060 -> 10.10.2.24:27838 [AP]
SIP/2.0 302 Moved Temporarily
FROM: "6005"<sip:6005@my.openser.de>;tag=4b086b07;transport=UDP
TO: <sip:11111@my.openser.de>;transport=UDP;tag=9cca2fa224
CSEQ: 2 INVITE
CALL-ID: NjQxNjk3ZDczZDkzN2ZmMzI5MzdiNzhkMzdmZTg0YzM
MAX-FORWARDS: 70
VIA: SIP/2.0/TCP 10.10.2.24;branch=z9hG4bK3e88.e9631885.0,SIP/2.0/UDP
10.5.3.22:5060;received=82.135.xx.xxx;branch=z9hG4bK-d8754z-be756d81d31da41
9-1---d8754z-;rport=5060 CONTENT-LENGTH: 0..
SERVER: RTCC/2.0.6017.0..CONTACT:
<sip:11111@10.10.2.13:5065;transport=UDP>
Hi, you say:
"In this case it answers per UPD as I explained before when OpenSER"
but it's not true, it's TCP, note the "T":
T 10.10.2.13:5060 -> 10.10.2.24:27838 [AP]
BTW, could you please capture the trace using ngrep with this syntax?:
~# ngrep -d any -P ' ' -W byline -T -t "" port 5060 or port 5065 or
port...
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es