Hello,

there is a rr modparam to turn of that warning, if you do not have many network interfaces/sockets that would require to select a specific one, then should be enough. Otherwise, see the archive in the past two weeks or so, there was a discussion about using socket names with record routes.

Cheers,
Daniel

On 25.02.21 10:51, Ilie Soltanici wrote:
Hello,

The loose_route function from the rr module is always getting an error in the logs that's not able to find the socket when the BYE request is coming from Kam to the Teams:

Feb 24 18:20:58 kamailio kam[24681]: WARNING: {BYE (1) | Seq=102 | Source IP=192.1668.1.1 (udp) | Call ID=2e701c07f99c5cb89fc72db225a6e309} rr [loose.c:800]: rr_do_force_send_socket(): no socket found to match second RR (sip:sbc-fqdn:5067;transport=tls;ftag=4ccd608c55e94f4aa094151dfd9e23a4;lr;r2=on)

This is the BYE message:

||||||||||||||||||||
====================
tag: rcv
pid: 24681
process: 3
time: 1614190858.750938
date: Wed Feb 24 18:20:58 2021
proto: udp ipv4
srcip: 192.168.1.2
srcport: 5060
dstip: 192.1668.1.1
dstport: 5060
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
BYE sip:api-du-c-euno.pstnhub.microsoft.com:443;x-i=58a922ac-934d-49cb-93b0-a7b435a36ea5;x-c=2e701c07f99c5cb89fc72db225a6e309/d/8/7776d3cf84d340a79f0a433d743e7a1a SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.1.2:5060;branch=z9hG4bK24411a29;rport
Route: <sip:192.168.1.1:5060;ftag=4ccd608c55e94f4aa094151dfd9e23a4;lr;r2=on>,<sip:sbc-fqdn:5067;transport=tls;ftag=4ccd608c55e94f4aa094151dfd9e23a4;lr;r2=on>,<sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr>
Max-Forwards: 70
From: <sip:+1234566789@sbc-fqdn:5067;user=phone>;tag=as72ae570b
To: user1<sip:+87654321@sip.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;user=phone>;tag=4ccd608c55e94f4aa094151dfd9e23a4
Call-ID: 2e701c07f99c5cb89fc72db225a6e309
CSeq: 102 BYE
User-Agent: COMPANY
Content-Length: 0

||||||||||||||||||||
====================

The domain from the second rr (sbc-fqdn:5067) it's perfectly valid and resolved from the kam server and from outside.

version: kamailio 5.4.4 (x86_64/linux) bdf4e0

Any thought here?
Thanks


On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 21:40, Ilie Soltanici <iliusha.md@gmail.com> wrote:
Changing enable_full_lr parameter from the rr module fixed the issue. Now I'm getting ACK from MS to 200OK.
Thank you

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 at 15:12, Juha Heinanen <jh@tutpro.com> wrote:

> SIP/2.0 200 OK
> Via: SIP/2.0/TLS 52.114.75.24:5061;branch=z9hG4bK6b5ac083
> Record-Route:
> <sip:fqdn:5067;transport=tls;r2=on;ftag=7a6409ee42ac48a897be110166a2bb0b;lr=on>
> Record-Route: <sip:sip-du-a-eu.pstnhub.microsoft.com:5061;transport=tls;lr>

I have ;r2=on in both R-R headers.  And also you have ;lr=on in one and
;lr in the other.

-- Juha

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users

_______________________________________________
Kamailio (SER) - Users Mailing List
sr-users@lists.kamailio.org
https://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users
-- 
Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com
www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Funding: https://www.paypal.me/dcmierla