29 Dec
2010
29 Dec
'10
8:07 p.m.
On 12/29/10 6:48 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
On 12/29/10 6:44 PM, Noa Resare wrote:
actually I backported for db_berkeley as well -- first time
I thought i
didn't do it.
However, the fix for db_berkely was done one day later than for dbtext,
the commit hash 8442fb34 -- take again the latest version of the branch.
Cheers,
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Kamailio (OpenSER) Advanced Training
Jan 24-26, 2011, Irvine, CA, USA
http://www.asipto.com
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 11:05 AM,
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
<miconda(a)gmail.com <mailto:miconda@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 12/27/10 2:09 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes:
Juha, can the files for former lcr module tables 'gw' and
'lcr' be
removed?
yes, in 3.1 lcr module uses these three tables: lcr_gw, lcr_rule,
lcr_rule_target.
ok, done, cherry-picked in 3.1 for dbtext and db_berkeley.
Great. I tried building .debs from the 3.1 branch (last
commit 553190) and indeed it reinits the database of DBTEXT type
correctly. Not for db_berkeley though.
thanks for trying and reporting. db_berkely wasn't fixed indeed, I
will do it in moments.