Andreas,
Just have a good look at this:
http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/devel/2008-June/014204.html it then moves here: http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/devel/2008-June/014372.html then here: http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/devel/2008-June/014122.html then here: http://lists.kamailio.org/pipermail/devel/2008-June/014456.html
I'd say both sides had their reasons, but one side never gave any explanation for why they were insisting on something that maybe could've been solve without much hassle. But both sides got too heated and this is the result of that -and I must say, a little selffish on both sides-
I'm really hoping both sides see their errors here, can work toghether again and do what we're all here to do, make the project move forward.
IMO, although it seems like Bodgan has founded reasons to be upset, in the end the local_route made its way into the release, even if it made it as an "experimental feature".
Have a good one all,
David.
P.S.: "Can't we all just get along?" hehe, just kidding
That thread is very illustrative.
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Andreas Granig agranig@sipwise.com wrote:
Guys,
I don't have any insights in what's going on on the board, but isn't the board supposed to prevent that one single guy can make decisions which influence the overall project like that?
Aren't you, Adrian, as a board member, supposed to stand up and take your chance to speak out loud that something is going THAT wrong? And if you did, and your voice wasn't heard due to this high S/N ratio because of some discussions about some features or whatever, why didn't anybody else on the board complain?
I'm just a little bit suspicious about one person pointing fingers at somebody else on the board, when there are (supposed to be) a couple of other parties who should represent the project, who didn't really complain or didn't stand up by now to explain the whole situation that is going on on the board?
Bogdan complained about being overruled by the board in different kind of things (from a technical and from a management point of view), and well, that happens in a project being lead by a couple of parties. But what I really miss is the other side of the story, like why the decisions where made as they were made. And the fact, that another board member puts down his vote like that (demanding that another board member quits) is not a sign of democracy. So maybe something is really going wrong on the board?
Just my thoughts? Andreas
Adrian Georgescu wrote:
Hello,
Because of sheer incompetence and abuse conduct of one of the recently adopted board members I decided to put my activities as a management board member of OpenSER/Kamailio project on hold.
I will be able to resume my activities after the voluntary leave of Henning Westerholt.
For those who do not know who I am, I was involved with OpenSER from Day 0 of its inception.
Kind regards, Adrian
Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users
Users mailing list Users@lists.kamailio.org http://lists.kamailio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/users