14 Aug
2014
14 Aug
'14
2:13 p.m.
On 14/08/14 12:47, Alex Balashov wrote:
On 08/14/2014 06:41 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
Just double checking -- you haven't disable the double rr via module,
isn't?
Do you have explicit listen= or it is left to listen on all interfaces?
Can you give the output of:
kamcmd corex.list_sockets ?
Daniel
--
Daniel-Constantin Mierla
http://twitter.com/#!/miconda - http://www.linkedin.com/in/miconda
Next Kamailio Advanced Trainings 2014 - http://www.asipto.com
Sep 22-25, Berlin, Germany ::: Oct 15-17, San Francisco, USA
On 14/08/14 12:14, Alex Balashov wrote:
Sure thing. I sent it to you privately to avoid masking IP addresses.
On 08/13/2014 11:28 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
Can you send the ngrep to see how it appears on the network?
On 13/08/14 17:21, Alex Balashov wrote:
> On 08/13/2014 11:03 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
>> Btw, is any of these sockets bound to a virtual network interface?
>
> Yes; it's eth0 and eth0:1. Is that a factor?
>
Could be. Is record_route() adding two headers?
No, it is not.