28 Nov
2005
28 Nov
'05
1:47 p.m.
If so, the first step will be see where they get lost...and if all of
them get lost. So..please check if you have them (all?) at the beginning
of failure route.
bogdan
Federico Giannici wrote:
Bogdan-Andrei Iancu wrote:
Hi Federico,
use avp_print() (works only with debug=9) in failure_route to
inspect the list of present AVP. maybe you do not have the AVPs you
are trying to log.
But I set those AVPs in EVERY message received by the server.
Moreover, I'm SURE they are there because before forwarding those
INVITEs with t_relay() I log the messages to syslog and the AVPs ARE
THERE.
Then, when some kind of errors are received (488, 422, etc.) it seems
that those AVPs are "lost" by the transaction engine...
But I'm not sure what conditions cause this lost.
Bye.
Federico Giannici wrote:
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
Hello,
have you set the flag to log missed transaction?
http://openser.org/docs/modules/1.0.x/acc.html#AEN407
No, I set the following:
modparam("acc", "db_flag", 1)
modparam("acc", "failed_transaction_flag", 1)
But no "db_missed_flag".
Anyway:
1) I don't want to log missed calls in a separate table.
2) The failed INVITEs are actually logged in the normal table, but
the AVPs I set are not logged (it seems that they are not found).
In normal cases the AVP are correctly logged. Even in many error
cases (404, and so on) they are logged too. But in some cases, with
strange errors (488, 422), the AVPs are NOT logged (accounting is
done, but AVPs are "n\a")!
Any explanation of this?
Thanks.
Or is that the some avps are not any more stored
for failed
transaction? Maybe some snippets of your config will give us more
hints about what happens there.
Cheers,
Daniel
On 11/26/05 14:04, Federico Giannici wrote:
> I'm using OpenSER 1.0.0 on OpenBSD 3.7 amd64.
>
> I have a strange problem with the accounting: I set a couple of
> AVPs for every message that arrives at the server. I'm sure they
> are there because they are written in the syslog logging.
> Sometimes, when an INVITE is relayed (with transactions) and
> receives an error (488, 422, etc.), in the SQL logging there is no
> more presence of the AVPs!
> Is this a known problem?
> How can I avoid this?
>
>
> Thanks.
>