On Thursday 01 December 2005 11:50, Teemu Harju wrote:
Couterpath (www.counterpath.com) (formerly known as Xten) has this Xtunnel ( www.xtunnels.org) which sort of solves the NAT traversal problem. I haven't used it but I think it does. Correct me if I'm wrong. Btw... does anyone have experience using Xtunnel in their system?
Of course only clients supporting this are their own.. x-lite & eyebeam, but they aren't the worst clients around. Eyebeam has even sort of "ICE support". Meaning no TURN protocol, but STUN and Xtunnel.
Yes Eyebeam has ICE support. But as I said, as ICE is still a moving target I'm not aware of any interoperable ICE implementation.
And to avoid confusion: ICE with Xtunnel makes IMHO no sence. ICE is for media path optimisation. TURN is for NAT traversal. These are almost counterparts.
Regards Nils
- Teemu
2005/12/1, Cesc cesc.santa@gmail.com:
On 11/30/05, Nils Ohlmeier lists@ohlmeier.org wrote:
What you are probably thinking of is, that an UA with ICE support could
also
advertise its IP address and port of the RTP proxy, but this is then
called
TURN. And I think that is even more far away from becoming a standard, besides that their are AFAIK no UA's or TURN servers available yet.
Hope this helps Nils
I think that the MiniSIP project is developing one client and server... www.minisip.org, in the "branches" of the SVN repository. No idea how far is it from being usable at all.
Cesc
Serusers mailing list serusers@lists.iptel.org http://lists.iptel.org/mailman/listinfo/serusers
-- Teemu Harju http://www.teemuharju.net