8 Aug
2007
8 Aug
'07
2:47 p.m.
El Wednesday 08 August 2007 16:40:32 Papadopoulos Georgios escribió:
Hi Inaki,
Why would you leave out the "4" flag test in nat_uac_test() for the
replies?
Yes, sorry, 4 is valid.
Of course if I leave out the "2" test then
my example works (I
have tested it) but I am afraid that this will break some other NATed
senario. And if leave out the "2" test, should I also leave out the
"16"
test?
In my notes I have:
" 16) Is received port (source port of the packet) different from the port
specified in the top-most Via header? (this can be used to detect some broken
STUN implementations)"
Maybe test 16 is just for these broken STUN cases?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc(a)in.ilimit.es