8 Aug
2007
8 Aug
'07
10:47 a.m.
El Wednesday 08 August 2007 16:40:32 Papadopoulos Georgios escribió:
Hi Inaki,
Why would you leave out the "4" flag test in nat_uac_test() for the replies?
Yes, sorry, 4 is valid.
Of course if I leave out the "2" test then my example works (I have tested it) but I am afraid that this will break some other NATed senario. And if leave out the "2" test, should I also leave out the "16" test?
In my notes I have:
" 16) Is received port (source port of the packet) different from the port specified in the top-most Via header? (this can be used to detect some broken STUN implementations)"
Maybe test 16 is just for these broken STUN cases?
--
Iñaki Baz Castillo
ibc@in.ilimit.es