Are you searching for examples of serial / parallel forking config found in the TM module documentation ?
Reda
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 16:55, Carsten Bock carsten@ng-voice.com wrote:
Hi Uri,
you're wrong. "t_on_branch" works before the request is sent out.... The branches work in the manner, you program them in your logic (e.g. set the timeout for a request, then use failure route for serial branches). There is no general switch (and i'm not aware of any good docs regarding this) in order to do serial or parallel branches.
Carsten
2012/3/27 Uri Shacked ushacked@gmail.com:
In my case i need to change the header and then send it.
Here the case works if i make the changes after i sent the invite and got the reply. As i know the t_on_branch will work after the invite is
sent...
am i wrong?
There are many questions to ask about the branches... when do they work
in a
serial manner, when parallel... where can i find it documented best?
Hi,
try the following:
route { # Whatever you do in your main-route.... t_on_branch("modify_contact"); # Whatever you do in your main-route, the branch route is automatically triggered for each branch. t_relay(); }
branch_route[modify_contact] { remove_hf("Contact"); append_hf("Contact: sip:whatever at something\r\n"); }
failure_route[failure_from_np] { # You need to modify the triggered branch_route again, otherwise the same branch_route will triggered again... }
Just calling "append_branch" does not help.
Carsten
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Uri Shacked ushacked@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Uri Shacked uri.shacked@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Following the advice I got on the subject “remove_hf" and "append_hf"
one
after the other , twice, issue”, I tried to work with the
“append_branch()”
function.
What I need to do is, after I received the invite from the original
user,
I use SIP methods to work with the NP server. I subst() the user part,
send
the call to the NP server, get the reply, parse it and then subst()
back to
the destination and send the call out.
Doing it with “append_branch” seems logical.
I do “append_branch()” before changing the user, get the reply (301), goes on to failure route after the branch route was called, and from
there I
have a problem.
I need to continue my flow without the branch I added. How do I return
to
the original on?
I read about the t_drop_replies but didn’t quit understand…..
BR,
Uri
-- Carsten Bock CEO (Geschäftsführer)
ng-voice GmbH Schomburgstr. 80 D-22767 Hamburg / Germany
http://www.ng-voice.com mailto:carsten@ng-voice.com
Mobile +49 179 2021244 Office +49 40 34927219 Fax +49 40 34927220
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Hamburg Registergericht: Amtsgericht Hamburg, HRB 120189 Geschäftsführer: Carsten Bock Ust-ID: DE279344284
Hier finden Sie unsere handelsrechtlichen Pflichtangaben: http://www.ng-voice.com/imprint/
-- Meet ng-voice at LinuxTag 2012 in Berlin - May 23rd - 26th, 2012. Save the date!
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users