Re: [SR-Users] Which algorithm to use as load-balance

Hello Daniel, I compiled and i'm testing 5.2, but it doesn't seem to be doing what I was expecting, my config is as follows: route[DISPATCH] { dp_match("1", "$ru"); if(!ds_select_routes("1=4;11=9", "ruri", "10")) { send_reply("404", "No destination"); exit; } else { xlog("[DISPATCH] ds_select_dst was succesful\n"); } xlog("L_DBG", "--- SCRIPT: going to <$ru> via <$du>\n"); t_on_failure("RTF_DISPATCH"); route(RELAY); exit; } And my table is: +----+-------+------------------------------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+-------------+ | id | setid | destination | flags | priority | attrs | description | +----+-------+------------------------------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+-------------+ | 213 | 1 | sip:34.201.28.49:5080 | 0 | 10 | weight=100 | node1-proxy | | 229 | 1 | sip:54.209.229.198:5080 | 0 | 10 | weight=100 | node2-proxy | | 232 | 11 | sip:35.170.67.206:5080 | 0 | 10 | weight=100 | node3-proxy | +----+-------+------------------------------------+-------+----------+----------------------------+-------------+ But kamailio is always sending to the same ip 198, although it should be load-balancing round-robin to the 2 nodes on setid 1. And when those 2 nodes have 10 calls, then start sending to setid 11. Is my config wrong? Regards, David Villasmil email: david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com phone: +34669448337 On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 4:09 PM David Villasmil < david.villasmil.work(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: > Ah, 5.2 branch. Will test it, thanks! > > On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 16:06, Daniel-Constantin Mierla &lt;miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; > wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> besides master, you can also use branch 5.2 -- this is going to be used >> to release 5.2.0 and other future 5.2.x versions. Those two branches have >> the same version of the module at this moment. >> >> Cheers, >> Daniel >> On 15.11.18 16:48, David Villasmil wrote: >> >> Hey Daniel, >> >> Thanks for replying. Can I test this from master? >> >> David >> On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 at 15:12, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < >> miconda(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> On 14.11.18 23:16, David Villasmil wrote: >>> > Hello, >>> > >>> > Is it possible to set an algorithm like the following? >>> > >>> > fs1 - Priority 10 - maxload 20 calls >>> > fs2 - Priority 10 - maxload 20 calls >>> > fs3 - Priority 9 - maxload 20 calls >>> > fs4 - Priority 8 - maxload 20 calls >>> > fs5 - Priority 7 - maxload 20 calls >>> > >>> > So that, whenever any new call comes in, fs1 and fs2 would be used, >>> > meaning the fs with the highest priority would be use UNLESS there's >>> > 20 calls on that server, in which case, the next server with the >>> > highest priority would be used. >>> > >>> this should be easier possible with the upcoming 5.2.0 (to be released >>> in about 2 weeks or so), see: >>> >>> - >>> >>> https://www.kamailio.org/docs/modules/devel/modules/dispatcher.html#dispatc… >>> >>> For older versions you may need to do more complex logic in the >>> configuration file to call dispatcher for different groups at different >>> stages of failure re-routing. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Daniel >>> >>> -- >>> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.com >>> www.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >>> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com >>> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- >>> www.asipto.com >>> >>> -- >> Daniel-Constantin Mierla -- www.asipto.comwww.twitter.com/miconda -- www.linkedin.com/in/miconda >> Kamailio World Conference -- www.kamailioworld.com >> Kamailio Advanced Training, Nov 12-14, 2018, in Berlin -- www.asipto.com >> >>